Fassfern 2 Level Crossing
Caol and Mallaig, Highland
Fassfern 2 Level Crossing Location Map
Fassfern 2 Level Crossing Streetview
Maps are by Google and Open Streetmap. Streetview is by Google. See credits and copyright
for more detail.
Latitude: 56.8551 / 56°51'18"N
Longitude: -5.2459 / 5°14'45"W
OS Eastings: 202189
OS Northings: 778437
OS Grid: NN021784
Mapcode National: GBR FBFL.MW5
Mapcode Global: WH1FH.DY6P
We don't yet have any user-contributed photos of Fassfern 2 Level Crossing.
Add a photo
- Name: Fassfern 2
- Crossing Type: Private User worked Crossing with Telephone
- Location: Highland
- Postcode: PH337NP
- Route: Scotland
- ELR: MLG2
- Distance: 6 miles 22 chains
- Individual risk rating:
- Collective risk rating:
- Last assessment: January 2015
- Next assessment due: April 2018
- Types of trains: Passenger & Freight
- Line speed: 55 mph
- Trains per day: 12
- Infrequent Vehicle use
- Infrequent Pedestrian Use
- Misuse history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Jan-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Near-miss history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Jan-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Accident history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Jan-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Key risk factors:
- Current protection arrangements:
- Telephones provided for vehicle users
- Whistle boards provided on the rail approaches - train horn audible warning given (07:00 to 23:00)
Unitary Authority Ward (UTW): Caol and Mallaig
Unitary Authority: Highland Council
Scottish Parliament Region: Highlands and Islands
UK Parliament Constituency: Ross, Skye and Lochaber
European Region: Scotland
Scottish Parliament Constituency: Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch
- Individual Risk Rating is the risk to invidual users of the crossing.
It is presented as a single letter, with A being the highest risk and M being the lowest.
- Collective Risk Rating is the overall risk of any incident involving any person or vehicle on the crossing,
including train staff and passengers as well as users of the crossing. It is presented as a number, with 1 being the highest risk and 13 being
the lowest. This is the most important rating when prioritising safety measures at level crossings.