Frost Lane Level Crossing
Hythe and Dibden, Hampshire
Frost Lane Level Crossing Location Map
Frost Lane Level Crossing Streetview
Maps are by Google and Open Streetmap. Streetview is by Google. See credits and copyright
for more detail.
Latitude: 50.8606 / 50°51'38"N
Longitude: -1.3874 / 1°23'14"W
OS Eastings: 443210
OS Northings: 106970
OS Grid: SU432069
Mapcode National: GBR 888.XR0
Mapcode Global: FRA 76ZT.P93
We don't yet have any user-contributed photos of Frost Lane Level Crossing.
Add a photo
- Name: Frost Lane
- Crossing Type: Public Highway Automatic Half Barriers
- Location: New Forest District
- Postcode: SO453GG
- Route: Wessex
- ELR: TTF
- Distance: 89 miles 59 chains
- Individual risk rating:
- Collective risk rating:
- Last assessment: January 2014
- Next assessment due: April 2016
- Types of trains: Passenger & Freight
- Line speed: 30 mph
- Trains per day: 4
- 2457 Vehicles
- 324 Pedestrians or Cyclists
- Misuse history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Jan-2014), - Nil incidents since.
- Near-miss history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Jan-2014), - Nil incidents since.
- Accident history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Jan-2014), - Nil incidents since.
- Key risk factors:
- Large Numbers of HGVs
- Sun Glare
- Infrequent Trains
- Large Numbers of users
- Current protection arrangements:
- Half barrier equipment
- Road traffic light signals
- Audible alarm
District Council Ward: Furzedown and Hardley
County Council: Hampshire County Council
Civil Parish/community: Hythe and Dibden
District Council: New Forest District Council
UK Parliament Constituency: New Forest East
European Region: South East
County Council Electoral Division: South Waterside
- Individual Risk Rating is the risk to invidual users of the crossing.
It is presented as a single letter, with A being the highest risk and M being the lowest.
- Collective Risk Rating is the overall risk of any incident involving any person or vehicle on the crossing,
including train staff and passengers as well as users of the crossing. It is presented as a number, with 1 being the highest risk and 13 being
the lowest. This is the most important rating when prioritising safety measures at level crossings.