Hargham No 1 Level Crossing
Hargham No 1 Level Crossing Location Map
Hargham No 1 Level Crossing Streetview
Maps are by Google and Open Streetmap. Streetview is by Google. See credits and copyright
for more detail.
Latitude: 52.4817 / 52°28'54"N
Longitude: 0.9807 / 0°58'50"E
OS Eastings: 602500
OS Northings: 291261
OS Grid: TM025912
Mapcode National: GBR SF3.GR2
Mapcode Global: VHKC3.YW9F
We don't yet have any user-contributed photos of Hargham No 1 Level Crossing.
Add a photo
- Name: Hargham No 1
- Crossing Type: Public Highway Automatic Half Barriers
- Location: Quidenham CP
- Postcode: NR162JN
- Route: Anglia
- ELR: ETN0
- Distance: 105 miles 29 chains
- Individual risk rating:
- Collective risk rating:
2 (Very High)
- Last assessment: October 2020
- Next assessment due: January 2020
- Types of trains: Passenger & Freight
- Line speed: 75
- Trains per day: 65
- 1907 Vehicles
- 21 Pedestrians or Cyclists
- Misuse history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Dec-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Near-miss history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Dec-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Accident history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Dec-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Key risk factors:
- Poor Visibility for Aapproaching Road Vehicles
- Crossing Approach
- Large Numbers of Users
- Sun Glare
- Deliberate Misuse or User Error
- Current protection arrangements:
- Road traffic light signals
- Half barrier equipment
- Audible alarm
District Council Ward: All Saints & Wayland
District Council: Breckland District Council
European Region: Eastern
County Council Electoral Division: Guiltcross
County Council: Norfolk County Council
Civil Parish/community: Quidenham
UK Parliament Constituency: South West Norfolk
- Individual Risk Rating is the risk to invidual users of the crossing.
It is presented as a single letter, with A being the highest risk and M being the lowest.
- Collective Risk Rating is the overall risk of any incident involving any person or vehicle on the crossing,
including train staff and passengers as well as users of the crossing. It is presented as a number, with 1 being the highest risk and 13 being
the lowest. This is the most important rating when prioritising safety measures at level crossings.