Lyngar 2 Level Crossing
Landward Caithness, Highland
Lyngar 2 Level Crossing Location Map
Lyngar 2 Level Crossing Streetview
Maps are by Google and Open Streetmap. Streetview is by Google. See credits and copyright
for more detail.
Latitude: 58.4926 / 58°29'33"N
Longitude: -3.3364 / 3°20'11"W
OS Eastings: 322194
OS Northings: 956822
OS Grid: ND221568
Mapcode National: GBR L648.SF8
Mapcode Global: WH6D4.QSFV
We don't yet have any user-contributed photos of Lyngar 2 Level Crossing.
Add a photo
- Name: Lyngar 2
- Crossing Type: Private Footpath Crossing
- Location: Highland
- Postcode: KW1 5XL
- Route: Scotland
- ELR: WCK
- Distance: 151 miles 74 chains
- Individual risk rating:
- Collective risk rating:
- Last assessment: September 2014
- Next assessment due: December 2017
- Types of trains: Passenger & Freight
- Line speed: 60 mph
- Trains per day: 8
- 2 Pedestrians or Cyclists
- Misuse history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Sep-2014), - Nil incidents since.
- Near-miss history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Sep-2014), - Nil incidents since.
- Accident history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Sep-2014), - Nil incidents since.
- Key risk factors:
- Sun Glare
- Infrequent Trains
- Deliberate misuse or user error
- Current protection arrangements:
- Whistle boards provided on the rail approaches - train horn audible warning given (07:00 to 23:00)
UK Parliament Constituency: Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross
Scottish Parliament Constituency: Caithness, Sutherland and Ross
Unitary Authority: Highland Council
Scottish Parliament Region: Highlands and Islands
Unitary Authority Ward (UTW): Landward Caithness
European Region: Scotland
- Individual Risk Rating is the risk to invidual users of the crossing.
It is presented as a single letter, with A being the highest risk and M being the lowest.
- Collective Risk Rating is the overall risk of any incident involving any person or vehicle on the crossing,
including train staff and passengers as well as users of the crossing. It is presented as a number, with 1 being the highest risk and 13 being
the lowest. This is the most important rating when prioritising safety measures at level crossings.