Mair No. 2 Level Crossing
Udimore, East Sussex
Mair No. 2 Level Crossing Location Map
Mair No. 2 Level Crossing Streetview
Maps are by Google and Open Streetmap. Streetview is by Google. See credits and copyright
for more detail.
Latitude: 50.93 / 50°55'48"N
Longitude: 0.6883 / 0°41'18"E
OS Eastings: 589010
OS Northings: 117951
OS Grid: TQ890179
Mapcode National: GBR QXV.LVH
Mapcode Global: FRA D6BN.800
We don't yet have any user-contributed photos of Mair No. 2 Level Crossing.
Add a photo
- Name: Mair No. 2
- Crossing Type: Private User worked Crossing with Telephone with Whistleboards
- Location: Udimore CP
- Postcode: TN316BY
- Route: Kent
- ELR: ATH0
- Distance: 73 miles 73 chains
- Individual risk rating:
- Collective risk rating:
- Last assessment: April 2020
- Next assessment due: July 2020
- Types of trains: Passenger & Freight
- Line speed: 60
- Trains per day: 38
- Infrequent vehicular use
- Infrequent Pedestrian use
- Misuse history: 1 incident in year prior to assessment date (Feb-2014), - Nil incidents since.
- Near-miss history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Feb-2014), - 1 incident since.
- Accident history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Feb-2014), - Nil incidents since.
- Key risk factors:
- Current protection arrangements:
- Telephones provided for vehicle users
- Gates or Barriers
- Whistle boards provided on the rail approaches - train horn audible warning given (06:00 to 23:59)
District Council Ward: Brede Valley
County Council Electoral Division: Brede Valley and Marsham
County Council: East Sussex County Council
UK Parliament Constituency: Hastings and Rye
District Council: Rother District Council
European Region: South East
Civil Parish/community: Udimore
- Individual Risk Rating is the risk to invidual users of the crossing.
It is presented as a single letter, with A being the highest risk and M being the lowest.
- Collective Risk Rating is the overall risk of any incident involving any person or vehicle on the crossing,
including train staff and passengers as well as users of the crossing. It is presented as a number, with 1 being the highest risk and 13 being
the lowest. This is the most important rating when prioritising safety measures at level crossings.