Snailham Level Crossing
Icklesham, East Sussex
Snailham Level Crossing Location Map
Snailham Level Crossing Streetview
Maps are by Google and Open Streetmap. Streetview is by Google. See credits and copyright
for more detail.
Latitude: 50.9268 / 50°55'36"N
Longitude: 0.6435 / 0°38'36"E
OS Eastings: 585873
OS Northings: 117476
OS Grid: TQ858174
Mapcode National: GBR QXS.TRG
Mapcode Global: FRA D67N.GHQ
We don't yet have any user-contributed photos of Snailham Level Crossing.
Add a photo
- Name: Snailham
- Crossing Type: Private User worked Crossing with Telephone
- Location: Icklesham CP
- Postcode: TN364AT
- Route: Kent
- ELR: ATH
- Distance: 75 miles 71 chains
- Individual risk rating:
- Collective risk rating:
- Last assessment: June 2015
- Next assessment due: August 2017
- Types of trains: Passenger & Freight
- Line speed: 60 mph
- Trains per day: 38
- 4 Vehicles
- 2 Pedestrians or Cyclists
- Misuse history: 1 incident in year prior to assessment date (Jun-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Near-miss history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Jun-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Accident history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Jun-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Key risk factors:
- No key risk drivers identified
- Current protection arrangements:
- Telephones provided for vehicle users
- Whistle boards provided on the rail approaches - train horn audible warning given (07:00 to 23:00)
District Council Ward: Eastern Rother
County Council: East Sussex County Council
UK Parliament Constituency: Hastings and Rye
Civil Parish/community: Icklesham
District Council: Rother District Council
County Council Electoral Division: Rye and Eastern Rother
European Region: South East
- Individual Risk Rating is the risk to invidual users of the crossing.
It is presented as a single letter, with A being the highest risk and M being the lowest.
- Collective Risk Rating is the overall risk of any incident involving any person or vehicle on the crossing,
including train staff and passengers as well as users of the crossing. It is presented as a number, with 1 being the highest risk and 13 being
the lowest. This is the most important rating when prioritising safety measures at level crossings.