Tan-lan Level Crossing
Llanddoged and Maenan, Conwy
Tan-lan Level Crossing Location Map
Tan-lan Level Crossing Streetview
Maps are by Google and Open Streetmap. Streetview is by Google. See credits and copyright
for more detail.
Latitude: 53.1551 / 53°9'18"N
Longitude: -3.8101 / 3°48'36"W
OS Eastings: 279059
OS Northings: 363531
OS Grid: SH790635
Mapcode National: GBR 63.5BYV
Mapcode Global: WH65Q.FYXL
We don't yet have any user-contributed photos of Tan-lan Level Crossing.
Add a photo
- Name: Tan-lan
- Crossing Type: Private User worked Crossing with Telephone
- Location: Llanddoged and Maenan Community
- Postcode: LL260TT
- Route: Wales
- ELR: LJT1
- Distance: 10 miles 31 chains
- Individual risk rating:
- Collective risk rating:
- Last assessment: October 2015
- Next assessment due: January 2018
- Types of trains: Passenger & Freight
- Line speed: 45 mph
- Trains per day: 12
- 3 Vehicles
- Infrequent Pedestrian Use
- Misuse history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Oct-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Near-miss history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Oct-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Accident history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Oct-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Key risk factors:
- Current protection arrangements:
- Telephones provided for vehicle users
- Whistle boards provided on the rail approaches - train horn audible warning given (07:00 to 23:00)
UK Parliament Constituency: Aberconwy
Welsh Assembly Constituency: Aberconwy
Unitary Authority: Conwy Council
Unitary Authority Electoral Division (UTE): Eglwysbach
Civil Parish/community: Llanddoged and Maenan Community
Welsh Assembly Region: North Wales
European Region: Wales
- Individual Risk Rating is the risk to invidual users of the crossing.
It is presented as a single letter, with A being the highest risk and M being the lowest.
- Collective Risk Rating is the overall risk of any incident involving any person or vehicle on the crossing,
including train staff and passengers as well as users of the crossing. It is presented as a number, with 1 being the highest risk and 13 being
the lowest. This is the most important rating when prioritising safety measures at level crossings.