Brooks Lane Level Crossing
Colgate, West Sussex
Brooks Lane Level Crossing Location Map
Brooks Lane Level Crossing Streetview
Maps are by Google and Open Streetmap. Streetview is by Google. See credits and copyright
for more detail.
Latitude: 51.0881 / 51°5'17"N
Longitude: -0.2806 / 0°16'50"W
OS Eastings: 520518
OS Northings: 133495
OS Grid: TQ205334
Mapcode National: GBR HJB.MX4
Mapcode Global: FRA B697.VXH
We don't yet have any user-contributed photos of Brooks Lane Level Crossing.
Add a photo
- Name: Brooks Lane
- Crossing Type: Public Footpath Crossing
- Location: Colgate CP
- Postcode: RH124SB
- Route: Sussex
- ELR: TBH1
- Distance: 35 miles 23 chains
- Individual risk rating:
- Collective risk rating:
- Last assessment: April 2015
- Next assessment due: July 2017
- Types of trains: Passenger & Freight
- Line speed: 85 mph
- Trains per day: 168
- 7 Pedestrians or Cyclists
- Misuse history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Apr-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Near-miss history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Apr-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Accident history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Apr-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Key risk factors:
- Frequent Trains
- Low Sighting Time
- Current protection arrangements:
- Whistle boards provided on the rail approach in one direction - train horn audible warning given (07:00 to 23:00)
Civil Parish/community: Colgate
UK Parliament Constituency: Horsham
District Council: Horsham District Council
District Council Ward: Rusper and Colgate
European Region: South East
County Council Electoral Division: Warnham and Rusper
County Council: West Sussex County Council
- Individual Risk Rating is the risk to invidual users of the crossing.
It is presented as a single letter, with A being the highest risk and M being the lowest.
- Collective Risk Rating is the overall risk of any incident involving any person or vehicle on the crossing,
including train staff and passengers as well as users of the crossing. It is presented as a number, with 1 being the highest risk and 13 being
the lowest. This is the most important rating when prioritising safety measures at level crossings.