Maryburgh Level Crossing
Dingwall and Seaforth, Highland
Maryburgh Level Crossing Location Map
Maryburgh Level Crossing Streetview
Maps are by Google and Open Streetmap. Streetview is by Google. See credits and copyright
for more detail.
Latitude: 57.5743 / 57°34'27"N
Longitude: -4.4394 / 4°26'21"W
OS Eastings: 254215
OS Northings: 856421
OS Grid: NH542564
Mapcode National: GBR H8DP.Z3G
Mapcode Global: WH3DN.SW6C
We don't yet have any user-contributed photos of Maryburgh Level Crossing.
Add a photo
- Name: Maryburgh
- Crossing Type: Private User worked Crossing with Telephone
- Location: Highland
- Postcode: IV7 8DU
- Route: Scotland
- ELR: WCK
- Distance: 17 miles 15 chains
- Individual risk rating:
- Collective risk rating:
- Last assessment: March 2015
- Next assessment due: June 2017
- Types of trains: Passenger & Freight
- Line speed: 75 mph
- Trains per day: 27
- Infrequent Vehicle use
- 4 Pedestrians or Cyclists
- Misuse history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Mar-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Near-miss history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Mar-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Accident history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Mar-2015), - Nil incidents since.
- Key risk factors:
- Sun Glare
- Low Sighting Time
- Current protection arrangements:
- Telephones provided for vehicle users
- Whistle boards provided on the rail approaches - train horn audible warning given (07:00 to 23:00)
Unitary Authority Ward (UTW): Dingwall and Seaforth
Unitary Authority: Highland Council
Scottish Parliament Region: Highlands and Islands
UK Parliament Constituency: Ross, Skye and Lochaber
European Region: Scotland
Scottish Parliament Constituency: Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch
- Individual Risk Rating is the risk to invidual users of the crossing.
It is presented as a single letter, with A being the highest risk and M being the lowest.
- Collective Risk Rating is the overall risk of any incident involving any person or vehicle on the crossing,
including train staff and passengers as well as users of the crossing. It is presented as a number, with 1 being the highest risk and 13 being
the lowest. This is the most important rating when prioritising safety measures at level crossings.