Veals Lane Level Crossing
Hythe and Dibden, Hampshire
Veals Lane Level Crossing Location Map
Veals Lane Level Crossing Streetview
Maps are by Google and Open Streetmap. Streetview is by Google. See credits and copyright
for more detail.
Latitude: 50.8825 / 50°52'56"N
Longitude: -1.4418 / 1°26'30"W
OS Eastings: 439361
OS Northings: 109371
OS Grid: SU393093
Mapcode National: GBR 76P.N8V
Mapcode Global: FRA 76WR.S4Q
We don't yet have any user-contributed photos of Veals Lane Level Crossing.
Add a photo
- Name: Veals Lane
- Crossing Type: Public Highway Automatic Half Barriers
- Location: New Forest District
- Postcode: SO404WW
- Route: Wessex
- ELR: TTF0
- Distance: 86 miles 69 chains
- Individual risk rating:
- Collective risk rating:
- Last assessment: July 2020
- Next assessment due: October 2020
- Types of trains: Passenger & Freight
- Line speed: 30
- Trains per day: 2
- 378 Vehicles
- Infrequent Pedestrian use
- Misuse history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Feb-2013), - Nil incidents since.
- Near-miss history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Feb-2013), - Nil incidents since.
- Accident history: Nil incidents in year prior to assessment date (Feb-2013), - Nil incidents since.
- Key risk factors:
- Poor Visibility for Aapproaching Road Vehicles
- Infrequent Trains
- Crossing Approach
- Current protection arrangements:
- Road traffic light signals
- Half barrier equipment
- Audible alarm
County Council Electoral Division: Dibden and Hythe
District Council Ward: Dibden and Hythe East
County Council: Hampshire County Council
Civil Parish/community: Hythe and Dibden
District Council: New Forest District Council
UK Parliament Constituency: New Forest East
European Region: South East
- Individual Risk Rating is the risk to invidual users of the crossing.
It is presented as a single letter, with A being the highest risk and M being the lowest.
- Collective Risk Rating is the overall risk of any incident involving any person or vehicle on the crossing,
including train staff and passengers as well as users of the crossing. It is presented as a number, with 1 being the highest risk and 13 being
the lowest. This is the most important rating when prioritising safety measures at level crossings.